“It often happens that a player carries out a deep and complicated calculation, but fails to spot something elementary right at the first move.” — Alexander Kotov, Chess Grandmaster
Understanding the FX impact on corporate earnings and guidance is crucial for both businesses and analysts. With over 45% of S&P 500 companies generating revenues internationally, last year’s poor hedging performance by US multinational corporations raised concerns. Many CFOs failed to explain their hedging decisions adequately during earnings calls, despite claims by treasury management system providers of providing easy solutions to limit FX impact.
While hedging earnings presents challenges such as exposure estimation and accounting complexities, only a small percentage of companies actually hedge their earnings risk to the consolidated income. The discrepancy between the number of companies citing earnings volatility as a key risk and those actually hedging their earnings translation exposure raises questions about the influence of financial accounting on decision-making processes.
Key Questions to Ponder
- Are CFOs and treasurers making effective hedging decisions?
- Is financial accounting driving decisions rather than risk assessment?
- Is the categorization of FX risk hindering effective risk management?
The Fungibility of FX
The interchangeable nature of FX risks can be misleading. For instance, addressing structural risk by relocating production facilities may simply shift the core risk from transactional to translational. Subsidiaries reinvesting earnings can lead to the accumulation of transactional risk, aligning with translational risk over time.
Hedging vs. Accounting Dilemma
Financial accounting rules offer three types of hedges: fair value, cash flow, and net investment hedges. The choice of hedging impacts how FX gains or losses are treated in financial statements. Many corporates opt for cash flow hedges over fair value hedges due to accounting treatments, leaving them vulnerable to adverse FX impacts during market fluctuations.
Boardroom Dynamics
Boardroom discussions on FX’s impact on EPS often overlook critical questions, emphasizing technology and macroeconomic factors instead. Holding CFOs accountable for hedging decisions and aligning risk measures with business objectives is crucial. Understanding risk aversion levels and selecting appropriate risk measures is key to effective hedging strategies.
Conclusion
Effective corporate hedging requires a holistic approach, understanding the fungibility of FX risk, and aligning risk measures with business objectives. Thoughtful hedging policies and appropriate risk benchmarks are essential for successful risk management. Subscribing to Enterprising Investor can provide valuable insights on corporate hedging strategies.
If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to Enterprising Investor.